What horrors behind “mysterious ways”

The local catholic school organizes a day’s outing with three classes of third grade. They plan to visit the local zoo and have a picnic. The school bus goes off a cliff and crashes in the valley below. The driver, four teachers and 57 children perish in the crash.

The community is devastated by this tragedy. The local priest, in his sermon, says that god works in mysterious ways.


Randomness seems to be one of the hardest things to understand and accept. Everything must have a meaning. When we find none, we still try to shoehorn the tragedy into something bigger, god. Since it does not make sense, the only solution left is that “god works in mysterious ways”.

After the first reaction of denial comes anger. By wrapping the tragedy into god’s will, even with the “mysterious” part, you cannot really express your anger. You cannot be angry at god. How can you get through your grief?

But it is also saying that there is some greater good in the grand scheme of things. That the end justifies the means. Somehow, the death of those children is part of god’s plan. What about every other tragedy or injustice? Should we ignore civil rights abuses, tyranny, torture? Could there be some sequence of events that make these horrors worth it?

Say it is the distant end result that matters, how do we know what to do? If everything horrible is part of the plan, what should we do? If we had saved those children, would we have gone against god’s plan? Should we have blown up the school to further god’s plan?

We know better than that. We know in our gut that doing something horrible for the best intentions is still horrible. You cannot do simple accounting to justify being bad because you will make it up later. If you believe we will be judged on our actions, you don’t believe that it will be on the average. Sum up the good, the bad and the horrible and if it averages out a little good, it’s OK.

There is no mysterious plan that justifies the horrors of the world. There cannot be.

028-God-at-hsi-computer

Religion is the art of the loophole

Mary is unfaithful to her husband. Every Sunday she confesses this to her priest, says her penitence and feels quite relieved.

Is confession and penitence really just an easy why to avoid guilt?


Aamina wears her burqa whenever she leaves the house. The only part of herself that she can influence to feel beautiful are her eyes. She spends a lot of time to get her make-up just right. And her glittering Dior handbag is very nice.

One of the goals of the burqa is modesty, to hide a women’s femininity as to not excite men (who seem highly inflammable). Don’t all these workarounds to feminize however possible the women wearing the burqa seem to go against the whole point?


Naomi, a practicing jewish mother of three, wears an extravagant long red wig, instead of the traditional headscarf.

According to jewish law, married women should not show their hair, also for modesty. Doesn’t an extravagant wig seem particularly hypocritical?


Examples range from major side stepping to the mundane actions of everyday life. They are surprisingly widespread and accepted by society and religion. Why does the dogma not openly change? The seemingly important part – obeying the law of god – is not respected, but the more frivolous part – what the neighbours will think – stays paramount.

Religion is the art of the loophole.

It boils down to tribal unity, us versus them. I’m a good christian because I confess my sins, not like those debauched women. I am a good muslim or jew because I am recognised as such by others.

Pasted Graphic 8

%d bloggers like this: